The Foxes walk upon it

"And at the same time they will come to understand and see that it is the Rebbe who runs this world, until he comes to take us out of galus."

The author of the above statement is one Rabbi Boruch Shalom Cunin. Rabbi Cunin was personally appointed shaliach to the West Coast of the United States by Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the late leader of the Lubavitch movement.This statement is astonishing in its sadness and terrifying in its explicitness.

I would like to contrast this statement to one of Zecharia that many have the minhag of saying at the end of the Aleinu.

ט והיה יהוה למלך, על-כל-הארץ; ביום ההוא, יהיה יהוה אחד--ושמו אחד.
"And it will be that the Lrd is King over all the Land, on that day he and his name will be unified"
This is the idea of Yimos Hamashiach according to Zechariah . It is a period of time when the entire world recognizes the reality of the Kingship of G and serves him accordingly. His name and He will be unified, in other words the entire world will desire to serve only the true conception of G. No longer will man serve the desires of his heart nor the lusts of his eyes. Currently there are those that serve G and those that serve a distorted notion of G, I believe that the unification at the end of the pasuk refers to an era when there will be no more distortions of the real Name of G and everyone will serve the Creator of Heaven and Earth.

The statement of Rabbi Cunin is disturbing in its fundamental denial of G and its sheer brazenness. What Rabbi Cunin is saying has reached a new pinnacle in heresy. " At the same time", similar phraseology as Zecharia, Cunin is longing for the day when," they will come to understand", presumably he means the world, this would I suppose include those who accept the 13 Ikkarim," that it is the Rebbe who runs the world until he comes to take us out of Galus".

Rabbi Cunin has replaced G with the Rebbe, he longs for the day that mankind will pervert themselves into believing that Menachem Mendel Schneerson is G, and at that time the Rebbi will return and save Rabbi Cunin from Galus.


So it is quite clear. The G of Israel is not the G of Rabbi Cunin. This is sad enough. It is a tragedy that one person has a faulty idea but this tragedy is magnified when we consider who he is. Rabbi Cunin is in the position to influence thousands upon thousands of Jews via his work as the head of Chabad in California and Nevada. This is the real tragedy, not only does Rabbi Cunin believe the most despicable of beliefs but he is a teacher and advisor to thousands of Jews. I do not know if Rabbi Cunin is alone in his belief, I pray that he is although I suspect he is not. This makes a clear statement about his movement however. Any movement that will allow one of its leaders to harbor these ideas is clearly not dedicated to the ikkarim. The presence of what would seem like authentic Jewish leaders declaring these perversions is the real tragedy of our time.

The crown is fallen from our head; woe unto us! for we have sinned.For this our heart is faint, for these things our eyes are dim;For the mountain of Zion, which is desolate, the foxes walk upon it.

Psalms 119 and the Code of Maimonides

The Mishneh Torah is divided into 14 books. Before the 14 books is the Hakdamah. The Rambam organized each book in a logical order halacha following from halacha, perek from perek, section from section. At the head of each book there is a pasuk from Nach, this is a heading for the entire book to follow ( and is the essential 'theme'). Following the Pasuk is the table of contents for that book, what halacha sections are where, each of these sections is prefaced by a Koteres, a heading that lists and categorizes all the commandments in that section ( aseh or Lo Ta'aseh). The following chapter is Psalms 119 the Rambam heads 8 of his 14 books with verses from this chapter, as such a keen understanding of this section will no doubt open worlds within the Mishneh Torah. Below is the chapter with the heading verses hyperlinked to their sefer to ease reference.

א אַשְׁרֵי תְמִימֵי-דָרֶךְ-- הַהֹלְכִים, בְּתוֹרַת יְהוָה.ב אַשְׁרֵי, נֹצְרֵי עֵדֹתָיו; בְּכָל-לֵב יִדְרְשׁוּהוּ.ג אַף, לֹא-פָעֲלוּ עַוְלָה; בִּדְרָכָיו הָלָכוּ.ד אַתָּה, צִוִּיתָה פִקֻּדֶיךָ-- לִשְׁמֹר מְאֹד.ה אַחֲלַי, יִכֹּנוּ דְרָכָי-- לִשְׁמֹר חֻקֶּיךָ.ו אָז לֹא-אֵבוֹשׁ-- בְּהַבִּיטִי, אֶל-כָּל-מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ.ז אוֹדְךָ, בְּיֹשֶׁר לֵבָב-- בְּלָמְדִי, מִשְׁפְּטֵי צִדְקֶךָ.ח אֶת-חֻקֶּיךָ אֶשְׁמֹר; אַל-תַּעַזְבֵנִי עַד-מְאֹד.
ט בַּמֶּה יְזַכֶּה-נַּעַר, אֶת-אָרְחוֹ-- לִשְׁמֹר, כִּדְבָרֶךָ.י בְּכָל-לִבִּי דְרַשְׁתִּיךָ; אַל-תַּשְׁגֵּנִי, מִמִּצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ.יא בְּלִבִּי, צָפַנְתִּי אִמְרָתֶךָ-- לְמַעַן, לֹא אֶחֱטָא-לָךְ.יב בָּרוּךְ אַתָּה יְהוָה-- לַמְּדֵנִי חֻקֶּיךָ.יג בִּשְׂפָתַי סִפַּרְתִּי-- כֹּל, מִשְׁפְּטֵי-פִיךָ.יד בְּדֶרֶךְ עֵדְו‍ֹתֶיךָ שַׂשְׂתִּי-- כְּעַל כָּל-הוֹן.טו בְּפִקּוּדֶיךָ אָשִׂיחָה; וְאַבִּיטָה, אֹרְחֹתֶיךָ.טז בְּחֻקֹּתֶיךָ אֶשְׁתַּעֲשָׁע; לֹא אֶשְׁכַּח דְּבָרֶךָ.
יז גְּמֹל עַל-עַבְדְּךָ אֶחְיֶה; וְאֶשְׁמְרָה דְבָרֶךָ.יח גַּל-עֵינַי וְאַבִּיטָה-- נִפְלָאוֹת, מִתּוֹרָתֶךָ.יט גֵּר אָנֹכִי בָאָרֶץ; אַל-תַּסְתֵּר מִמֶּנִּי, מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ.כ גָּרְסָה נַפְשִׁי לְתַאֲבָה-- אֶל-מִשְׁפָּטֶיךָ בְכָל-עֵת.כא גָּעַרְתָּ, זֵדִים אֲרוּרִים-- הַשֹּׁגִים, מִמִּצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ.כב גַּל מֵעָלַי, חֶרְפָּה וָבוּז: כִּי עֵדֹתֶיךָ נָצָרְתִּי.כג גַּם יָשְׁבוּ שָׂרִים, בִּי נִדְבָּרוּ-- עַבְדְּךָ, יָשִׂיחַ בְּחֻקֶּיךָ.כד גַּם-עֵדֹתֶיךָ, שַׁעֲשֻׁעָי-- אַנְשֵׁי עֲצָתִי.
כה דָּבְקָה לֶעָפָר נַפְשִׁי; חַיֵּנִי, כִּדְבָרֶךָ.כו דְּרָכַי סִפַּרְתִּי, וַתַּעֲנֵנִי; לַמְּדֵנִי חֻקֶּיךָ.כז דֶּרֶךְ-פִּקּוּדֶיךָ הֲבִינֵנִי; וְאָשִׂיחָה, בְּנִפְלְאוֹתֶיךָ.כח דָּלְפָה נַפְשִׁי, מִתּוּגָה; קַיְּמֵנִי, כִּדְבָרֶךָ.כט דֶּרֶךְ-שֶׁקֶר, הָסֵר מִמֶּנִּי; וְתוֹרָתְךָ חָנֵּנִי.ל דֶּרֶךְ-אֱמוּנָה בָחָרְתִּי; מִשְׁפָּטֶיךָ שִׁוִּיתִי.לא דָּבַקְתִּי בְעֵדְו‍ֹתֶיךָ; יְהוָה, אַל-תְּבִישֵׁנִי.לב דֶּרֶךְ-מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ אָרוּץ: כִּי תַרְחִיב לִבִּי.
לג הוֹרֵנִי יְהוָה, דֶּרֶךְ חֻקֶּיךָ; וְאֶצְּרֶנָּה עֵקֶב.לד הֲבִינֵנִי, וְאֶצְּרָה תוֹרָתֶךָ; וְאֶשְׁמְרֶנָּה בְכָל-לֵב.לה הַדְרִיכֵנִי, בִּנְתִיב מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ: כִּי-בוֹ חָפָצְתִּי.לו הַט-לִבִּי, אֶל-עֵדְו‍ֹתֶיךָ; וְאַל אֶל-בָּצַע.לז הַעֲבֵר עֵינַי, מֵרְאוֹת שָׁוְא; בִּדְרָכֶךָ חַיֵּנִי.לח הָקֵם לְעַבְדְּךָ, אִמְרָתֶךָ-- אֲשֶׁר, לְיִרְאָתֶךָ.לט הַעֲבֵר חֶרְפָּתִי, אֲשֶׁר יָגֹרְתִּי: כִּי מִשְׁפָּטֶיךָ טוֹבִים.מ הִנֵּה, תָּאַבְתִּי לְפִקֻּדֶיךָ; בְּצִדְקָתְךָ חַיֵּנִי.
מא וִיבֹאֻנִי חֲסָדֶךָ יְהוָה; תְּשׁוּעָתְךָ, כְּאִמְרָתֶךָ.מב וְאֶעֱנֶה חֹרְפִי דָבָר: כִּי-בָטַחְתִּי, בִּדְבָרֶךָ.מג וְאַל-תַּצֵּל מִפִּי דְבַר-אֱמֶת עַד-מְאֹד: כִּי לְמִשְׁפָּטֶךָ, יִחָלְתִּי.מד וְאֶשְׁמְרָה תוֹרָתְךָ תָמִיד-- לְעוֹלָם וָעֶד.מה וְאֶתְהַלְּכָה בָרְחָבָה: כִּי פִקֻּדֶיךָ דָרָשְׁתִּי.מו וַאֲדַבְּרָה בְעֵדֹתֶיךָ, נֶגֶד מְלָכִים; וְלֹא אֵבוֹשׁ.מז וְאֶשְׁתַּעֲשַׁע בְּמִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ, אֲשֶׁר אָהָבְתִּי.מח וְאֶשָּׂא-כַפַּי--אֶל-מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ, אֲשֶׁר אָהָבְתִּי; וְאָשִׂיחָה בְחֻקֶּיךָ.
מט זְכֹר-דָּבָר, לְעַבְדֶּךָ-- עַל, אֲשֶׁר יִחַלְתָּנִי.נ זֹאת נֶחָמָתִי בְעָנְיִי: כִּי אִמְרָתְךָ חִיָּתְנִי.נא זֵדִים, הֱלִיצֻנִי עַד-מְאֹד; מִתּוֹרָתְךָ, לֹא נָטִיתִי.נב זָכַרְתִּי מִשְׁפָּטֶיךָ מֵעוֹלָם יְהוָה; וָאֶתְנֶחָם.נג זַלְעָפָה אֲחָזַתְנִי, מֵרְשָׁעִים-- עֹזְבֵי, תּוֹרָתֶךָ.נד זְמִרוֹת, הָיוּ-לִי חֻקֶּיךָ-- בְּבֵית מְגוּרָי.נה זָכַרְתִּי בַלַּיְלָה שִׁמְךָ יְהוָה; וָאֶשְׁמְרָה, תּוֹרָתֶךָ.נו זֹאת הָיְתָה-לִּי: כִּי פִקֻּדֶיךָ נָצָרְתִּי.
נז חֶלְקִי יְהוָה אָמַרְתִּי-- לִשְׁמֹר דְּבָרֶיךָ.נח חִלִּיתִי פָנֶיךָ בְכָל-לֵב; חָנֵּנִי, כְּאִמְרָתֶךָ.נט חִשַּׁבְתִּי דְרָכָי; וָאָשִׁיבָה רַגְלַי, אֶל-עֵדֹתֶיךָ.ס חַשְׁתִּי, וְלֹא הִתְמַהְמָהְתִּי-- לִשְׁמֹר, מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ.סא חֶבְלֵי רְשָׁעִים עִוְּדֻנִי; תּוֹרָתְךָ, לֹא שָׁכָחְתִּי.סב חֲצוֹת-לַיְלָה--אָקוּם, לְהוֹדוֹת לָךְ: עַל, מִשְׁפְּטֵי צִדְקֶךָ.סג חָבֵר אָנִי, לְכָל-אֲשֶׁר יְרֵאוּךָ; וּלְשֹׁמְרֵי, פִּקּוּדֶיךָ.סד חַסְדְּךָ יְהוָה, מָלְאָה הָאָרֶץ; חֻקֶּיךָ לַמְּדֵנִי.
סה טוֹב, עָשִׂיתָ עִם-עַבְדְּךָ-- יְהוָה, כִּדְבָרֶךָ.סו טוּב טַעַם וָדַעַת לַמְּדֵנִי: כִּי בְמִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ הֶאֱמָנְתִּי.סז טֶרֶם אֶעֱנֶה, אֲנִי שֹׁגֵג; וְעַתָּה, אִמְרָתְךָ שָׁמָרְתִּי.סח טוֹב-אַתָּה וּמֵטִיב; לַמְּדֵנִי חֻקֶּיךָ.סט טָפְלוּ עָלַי שֶׁקֶר זֵדִים; אֲנִי, בְּכָל-לֵב אֶצֹּר פִּקּוּדֶיךָ.ע טָפַשׁ כַּחֵלֶב לִבָּם; אֲנִי, תּוֹרָתְךָ שִׁעֲשָׁעְתִּי.עא טוֹב-לִי כִי-עֻנֵּיתִי-- לְמַעַן, אֶלְמַד חֻקֶּיךָ.עב טוֹב-לִי תוֹרַת-פִּיךָ-- מֵאַלְפֵי, זָהָב וָכָסֶף.
עג יָדֶיךָ עָשׂוּנִי, וַיְכוֹנְנוּנִי; הֲבִינֵנִי, וְאֶלְמְדָה מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ.עד יְרֵאֶיךָ, יִרְאוּנִי וְיִשְׂמָחוּ: כִּי לִדְבָרְךָ יִחָלְתִּי.עה יָדַעְתִּי יְהוָה, כִּי-צֶדֶק מִשְׁפָּטֶיךָ; וֶאֱמוּנָה, עִנִּיתָנִי.עו יְהִי-נָא חַסְדְּךָ לְנַחֲמֵנִי-- כְּאִמְרָתְךָ לְעַבְדֶּךָ.עז יְבֹאוּנִי רַחֲמֶיךָ וְאֶחְיֶה: כִּי-תוֹרָתְךָ, שַׁעֲשֻׁעָי.עח יֵבֹשׁוּ זֵדִים, כִּי-שֶׁקֶר עִוְּתוּנִי; אֲנִי, אָשִׂיחַ בְּפִקּוּדֶיךָ.עט יָשׁוּבוּ לִי יְרֵאֶיךָ; וידעו (וְיֹדְעֵי), עֵדֹתֶיךָ.פ יְהִי-לִבִּי תָמִים בְּחֻקֶּיךָ-- לְמַעַן, לֹא אֵבוֹשׁ.
פא כָּלְתָה לִתְשׁוּעָתְךָ נַפְשִׁי; לִדְבָרְךָ יִחָלְתִּי.פב כָּלוּ עֵינַי, לְאִמְרָתֶךָ-- לֵאמֹר, מָתַי תְּנַחֲמֵנִי.פג כִּי-הָיִיתִי, כְּנֹאד בְּקִיטוֹר-- חֻקֶּיךָ, לֹא שָׁכָחְתִּי.פד כַּמָּה יְמֵי-עַבְדֶּךָ; מָתַי תַּעֲשֶׂה בְרֹדְפַי מִשְׁפָּט.פה כָּרוּ-לִי זֵדִים שִׁיחוֹת-- אֲשֶׁר, לֹא כְתוֹרָתֶךָ.פו כָּל-מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ אֱמוּנָה; שֶׁקֶר רְדָפוּנִי עָזְרֵנִי.פז כִּמְעַט, כִּלּוּנִי בָאָרֶץ; וַאֲנִי, לֹא-עָזַבְתִּי פִקֻּדֶיךָ.פח כְּחַסְדְּךָ חַיֵּנִי; וְאֶשְׁמְרָה, עֵדוּת פִּיךָ.
פט לְעוֹלָם יְהוָה-- דְּבָרְךָ, נִצָּב בַּשָּׁמָיִם.צ לְדֹר וָדֹר, אֱמוּנָתֶךָ; כּוֹנַנְתָּ אֶרֶץ, וַתַּעֲמֹד.צא לְמִשְׁפָּטֶיךָ, עָמְדוּ הַיּוֹם: כִּי הַכֹּל עֲבָדֶיךָ.צב לוּלֵי תוֹרָתְךָ, שַׁעֲשֻׁעָי-- אָז, אָבַדְתִּי בְעָנְיִי.צג לְעוֹלָם, לֹא-אֶשְׁכַּח פִּקּוּדֶיךָ: כִּי בָם, חִיִּיתָנִי.צד לְךָ-אֲנִי, הוֹשִׁיעֵנִי: כִּי פִקּוּדֶיךָ דָרָשְׁתִּי.צה לִי קִוּוּ רְשָׁעִים לְאַבְּדֵנִי; עֵדֹתֶיךָ, אֶתְבּוֹנָן.צו לְכָל-תִּכְלָה, רָאִיתִי קֵץ; רְחָבָה מִצְוָתְךָ מְאֹד.
צז מָה-אָהַבְתִּי תוֹרָתֶךָ: כָּל-הַיּוֹם, הִיא שִׂיחָתִי.צח מֵאֹיְבַי, תְּחַכְּמֵנִי מִצְו‍ֹתֶךָ: כִּי לְעוֹלָם הִיא-לִי.צט מִכָּל-מְלַמְּדַי הִשְׂכַּלְתִּי: כִּי עֵדְו‍ֹתֶיךָ, שִׂיחָה לִי.ק מִזְּקֵנִים אֶתְבּוֹנָן: כִּי פִקּוּדֶיךָ נָצָרְתִּי.קא מִכָּל-אֹרַח רָע, כָּלִאתִי רַגְלָי-- לְמַעַן, אֶשְׁמֹר דְּבָרֶךָ.קב מִמִּשְׁפָּטֶיךָ לֹא-סָרְתִּי: כִּי-אַתָּה, הוֹרֵתָנִי.קג מַה-נִּמְלְצוּ לְחִכִּי, אִמְרָתֶךָ-- מִדְּבַשׁ לְפִי.קד מִפִּקּוּדֶיךָ אֶתְבּוֹנָן; עַל כֵּן, שָׂנֵאתִי כָּל-אֹרַח שָׁקֶר.
קה נֵר-לְרַגְלִי דְבָרֶךָ; וְאוֹר, לִנְתִיבָתִי.קו נִשְׁבַּעְתִּי וָאֲקַיֵּמָה-- לִשְׁמֹר, מִשְׁפְּטֵי צִדְקֶךָ.קז נַעֲנֵיתִי עַד-מְאֹד; יְהוָה, חַיֵּנִי כִדְבָרֶךָ.קח נִדְבוֹת פִּי, רְצֵה-נָא יְהוָה; וּמִשְׁפָּטֶיךָ לַמְּדֵנִי.קט נַפְשִׁי בְכַפִּי תָמִיד; וְתוֹרָתְךָ, לֹא שָׁכָחְתִּי.קי נָתְנוּ רְשָׁעִים פַּח לִי; וּמִפִּקּוּדֶיךָ, לֹא תָעִיתִי.קיא נָחַלְתִּי עֵדְו‍ֹתֶיךָ לְעוֹלָם: כִּי-שְׂשׂוֹן לִבִּי הֵמָּה.קיב נָטִיתִי לִבִּי, לַעֲשׂוֹת חֻקֶּיךָ-- לְעוֹלָם עֵקֶב.
קיג סֵעֲפִים שָׂנֵאתִי; וְתוֹרָתְךָ אָהָבְתִּי.קיד סִתְרִי וּמָגִנִּי אָתָּה; לִדְבָרְךָ יִחָלְתִּי.קטו סוּרוּ-מִמֶּנִּי מְרֵעִים; וְאֶצְּרָה, מִצְו‍ֹת אֱלֹהָי.קטז סָמְכֵנִי כְאִמְרָתְךָ וְאֶחְיֶה; וְאַל-תְּבִישֵׁנִי, מִשִּׂבְרִי.קיז סְעָדֵנִי וְאִוָּשֵׁעָה; וְאֶשְׁעָה בְחֻקֶּיךָ תָמִיד.קיח סָלִיתָ, כָּל-שׁוֹגִים מֵחֻקֶּיךָ: כִּי-שֶׁקֶר, תַּרְמִיתָם.קיט סִגִים--הִשְׁבַּתָּ כָל-רִשְׁעֵי-אָרֶץ; לָכֵן, אָהַבְתִּי עֵדֹתֶיךָ.קכ סָמַר מִפַּחְדְּךָ בְשָׂרִי; וּמִמִּשְׁפָּטֶיךָ יָרֵאתִי.
קכא עָשִׂיתִי, מִשְׁפָּט וָצֶדֶק; בַּל-תַּנִּיחֵנִי, לְעֹשְׁקָי.קכב עֲרֹב עַבְדְּךָ לְטוֹב; אַל-יַעַשְׁקֻנִי זֵדִים.קכג עֵינַי, כָּלוּ לִישׁוּעָתֶךָ; וּלְאִמְרַת צִדְקֶךָ.קכד עֲשֵׂה עִם-עַבְדְּךָ כְחַסְדֶּךָ; וְחֻקֶּיךָ לַמְּדֵנִי.קכה עַבְדְּךָ-אָנִי הֲבִינֵנִי; וְאֵדְעָה, עֵדֹתֶיךָ.קכו עֵת, לַעֲשׂוֹת לַיהוָה-- הֵפֵרוּ, תּוֹרָתֶךָ.קכז עַל-כֵּן, אָהַבְתִּי מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ-- מִזָּהָב וּמִפָּז.קכח עַל-כֵּן, כָּל-פִּקּוּדֵי כֹל יִשָּׁרְתִּי; כָּל-אֹרַח שֶׁקֶר שָׂנֵאתִי.
קכט פְּלָאוֹת עֵדְו‍ֹתֶיךָ; עַל-כֵּן, נְצָרָתַם נַפְשִׁי.קל פֵּתַח דְּבָרֶיךָ יָאִיר; מֵבִין פְּתָיִים.קלא פִּי-פָעַרְתִּי, וָאֶשְׁאָפָה: כִּי לְמִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ יָאָבְתִּי.קלב פְּנֵה-אֵלַי וְחָנֵּנִי-- כְּמִשְׁפָּט, לְאֹהֲבֵי שְׁמֶךָ.קלג פְּעָמַי, הָכֵן בְּאִמְרָתֶךָ; וְאַל-תַּשְׁלֶט-בִּי כָל-אָוֶן.קלד פְּדֵנִי, מֵעֹשֶׁק אָדָם; וְאֶשְׁמְרָה, פִּקּוּדֶיךָ.קלה פָּנֶיךָ, הָאֵר בְּעַבְדֶּךָ; וְלַמְּדֵנִי, אֶת-חֻקֶּיךָ.קלו פַּלְגֵי-מַיִם, יָרְדוּ עֵינָי-- עַל, לֹא-שָׁמְרוּ תוֹרָתֶךָ.
קלז צַדִּיק אַתָּה יְהוָה; וְיָשָׁר, מִשְׁפָּטֶיךָ.קלח צִוִּיתָ, צֶדֶק עֵדֹתֶיךָ; וֶאֱמוּנָה מְאֹד.קלט צִמְּתַתְנִי קִנְאָתִי: כִּי-שָׁכְחוּ דְבָרֶיךָ צָרָי.קמ צְרוּפָה אִמְרָתְךָ מְאֹד; וְעַבְדְּךָ אֲהֵבָהּ.קמא צָעִיר אָנֹכִי וְנִבְזֶה; פִּקֻּדֶיךָ, לֹא שָׁכָחְתִּי.קמב צִדְקָתְךָ צֶדֶק לְעוֹלָם; וְתוֹרָתְךָ אֱמֶת.קמג צַר-וּמָצוֹק מְצָאוּנִי; מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ, שַׁעֲשֻׁעָי.קמד צֶדֶק עֵדְו‍ֹתֶיךָ לְעוֹלָם; הֲבִינֵנִי וְאֶחְיֶה.
קמה קָרָאתִי בְכָל-לֵב, עֲנֵנִי יְהוָה; חֻקֶּיךָ אֶצֹּרָה.קמו קְרָאתִיךָ הוֹשִׁיעֵנִי; וְאֶשְׁמְרָה, עֵדֹתֶיךָ.קמז קִדַּמְתִּי בַנֶּשֶׁף, וָאֲשַׁוֵּעָה; לדבריך (לִדְבָרְךָ) יִחָלְתִּי.קמח קִדְּמוּ עֵינַי, אַשְׁמֻרוֹת-- לָשִׂיחַ, בְּאִמְרָתֶךָ.קמט קוֹלִי, שִׁמְעָה כְחַסְדֶּךָ; יְהוָה, כְּמִשְׁפָּטֶךָ חַיֵּנִי.קנ קָרְבוּ, רֹדְפֵי זִמָּה; מִתּוֹרָתְךָ רָחָקוּ.קנא קָרוֹב אַתָּה יְהוָה; וְכָל-מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ אֱמֶת.קנב קֶדֶם יָדַעְתִּי, מֵעֵדֹתֶיךָ: כִּי לְעוֹלָם יְסַדְתָּם.
קנג רְאֵה-עָנְיִי וְחַלְּצֵנִי: כִּי-תוֹרָתְךָ, לֹא שָׁכָחְתִּי.קנד רִיבָה רִיבִי, וּגְאָלֵנִי; לְאִמְרָתְךָ חַיֵּנִי.קנה רָחוֹק מֵרְשָׁעִים יְשׁוּעָה: כִּי חֻקֶּיךָ, לֹא דָרָשׁוּ.קנו רַחֲמֶיךָ רַבִּים יְהוָה; כְּמִשְׁפָּטֶיךָ חַיֵּנִי.קנז רַבִּים, רֹדְפַי וְצָרָי; מֵעֵדְו‍ֹתֶיךָ, לֹא נָטִיתִי.קנח רָאִיתִי בֹגְדִים, וָאֶתְקוֹטָטָה-- אֲשֶׁר אִמְרָתְךָ, לֹא שָׁמָרוּ.קנט רְאֵה, כִּי-פִקּוּדֶיךָ אָהָבְתִּי; יְהוָה, כְּחַסְדְּךָ חַיֵּנִי.קס רֹאשׁ-דְּבָרְךָ אֱמֶת; וּלְעוֹלָם, כָּל-מִשְׁפַּט צִדְקֶךָ.
קסא שָׂרִים, רְדָפוּנִי חִנָּם; ומדבריך (וּמִדְּבָרְךָ), פָּחַד לִבִּי.קסב שָׂשׂ אָנֹכִי, עַל-אִמְרָתֶךָ-- כְּמוֹצֵא, שָׁלָל רָב.קסג שֶׁקֶר שָׂנֵאתִי, וַאֲתַעֵבָה; תּוֹרָתְךָ אָהָבְתִּי.קסד שֶׁבַע בַּיּוֹם, הִלַּלְתִּיךָ-- עַל, מִשְׁפְּטֵי צִדְקֶךָ.קסה שָׁלוֹם רָב, לְאֹהֲבֵי תוֹרָתֶךָ; וְאֵין-לָמוֹ מִכְשׁוֹל.קסו שִׂבַּרְתִּי לִישׁוּעָתְךָ יְהוָה; וּמִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ עָשִׂיתִי.קסז שָׁמְרָה נַפְשִׁי, עֵדֹתֶיךָ; וָאֹהֲבֵם מְאֹד.קסח שָׁמַרְתִּי פִקּוּדֶיךָ, וְעֵדֹתֶיךָ: כִּי כָל-דְּרָכַי נֶגְדֶּךָ.
קסט תִּקְרַב רִנָּתִי לְפָנֶיךָ יְהוָה; כִּדְבָרְךָ הֲבִינֵנִי.קע תָּבוֹא תְּחִנָּתִי לְפָנֶיךָ; כְּאִמְרָתְךָ, הַצִּילֵנִי.קעא תַּבַּעְנָה שְׂפָתַי תְּהִלָּה: כִּי תְלַמְּדֵנִי חֻקֶּיךָ.קעב תַּעַן לְשׁוֹנִי, אִמְרָתֶךָ: כִּי כָל-מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ צֶּדֶק.קעג תְּהִי-יָדְךָ לְעָזְרֵנִי: כִּי פִקּוּדֶיךָ בָחָרְתִּי.קעד תָּאַבְתִּי לִישׁוּעָתְךָ יְהוָה; וְתוֹרָתְךָ, שַׁעֲשֻׁעָי.קעה תְּחִי-נַפְשִׁי, וּתְהַלְלֶךָּ; וּמִשְׁפָּטֶךָ יַעְזְרֻנִי.קעו תָּעִיתִי-- כְּשֶׂה אֹבֵד, בַּקֵּשׁ עַבְדֶּךָ:כִּי מִצְו‍ֹתֶיךָ, לֹא שָׁכָחְתִּי

Din and Rachamim Recap, or How Zaqui can Say what I mean concisely

Since I started thinking about the previous post because of Zaqui, ( May the Merciful One protect and establish him), I decided to send it to him. The following is his clarification of my point:

Midat HaDin and Midat HaRachamim are two levels of how nature interecats with man. Midat HaDin is the system of natural laws, and Midat HaRachamim is the system of laws that apply to certain individuals who are more in line with reality. Both midot are part of nature its just that Chachamim benefit more from both aspects whereas normal people only experience/benefit from one.In Noach's case, since the world became corrupted, it had to be destroyed according to natural law (Midat HaDin) but since Noach was a tzadik and lived in line with reality he was subject to another form of law which is why only he and his family was saved. So when the mefarshim point out an exmaple of Hashem's Midat HaRachamim it just means that the certain individuasl benefited from the second sub-system of Hashem's law.

Rachamim and Din

משוך חסדך, ליודעיך; וצדקתך, לישרי לב
O continue Thy lovingkindness unto them that know Thee; and Thy righteousness to the upright in heart

A few weeks back, I had the great blessing to have spent a shabbat in Rockville Maryland with my good friends the Maroofs, ( Rabbi Josh Maroof is the author of vesomsechel.blogspot.com, a personal favorite as well as the Rav of Magen David Sephardic Congregation). I had the opportunity to see my other good friend Zaqui and he asked me a vey good question.

How can we say that there exists Midat Hadin and Midat Harahamim , whilst maintaining the idea of Achduso, his oneness?

The question is of fundamental significance to our belief system. As you know we are told many times that G' is one . Maimonides explains that the knowledge of the existance of G' is the fundamental truth that all other knowledge is based on and that he is a unity that is incomparable to any conception of One that we could have.( Laws of the fundamentals of the Torah chapter 1 law 5{7})

ה [ז] אלוה זה אחד הוא--אינו לא שניים ולא יתר על שניים, אלא אחד, שאין כייחודו אחד מן האחדים הנמצאים בעולם: לא אחד כמין שהוא כולל אחדים הרבה, ולא אחד כגוף שהוא נחלק למחלקות ולקצוות; אלא ייחוד שאין ייחוד אחר כמותו בעולם.

Clearly the two attributes of Rachamim and Din cannot exist in such a way that they would imply a duality within G'!

This may be a simple point but I will state it anyway. The midot that we mention with regards to Hakadosh Baruch Hu, are not separate parts within G' but rather they are linguistic mechanisms that we use so that we can best describe an idea that we are utterly incapable of fully grasping. As Maimonides states further on in the Laws of the foundations of the Torah:

ט אם כן מה הוא זה שנאמר בתורה "ותחת רגליו" (שמות כד,י), "כתובים באצבע אלוהים" (שמות לא,יח; דברים ט,י), "יד ה'" (שמות ט,ג; במדבר יא,כג; דברים ב,טו), "עיני ה'" (דברים יא,יב), "אוזני ה'" (במדבר יא,א; במדבר יא,יח), וכיוצא בדברים הללו--הכול לפי דעתן של בני אדם הוא, שאינן מכירין אלא הגופות; ודיברה תורה כלשון בני אדם. והכול כינויים הם, כמו שנאמר "אם שנותי ברק חרבי" (דברים לב,מא), וכי חרב יש לו ובחרב הוא הורג; אלא משל, והכול משל

9) If so, (That it is explained in the Torah that G' is incorporeal)what does the Torah mean when it says things like, "under His feet" (Exodus 31:18), "written with the finger of God" (ibid), "the hand of the Lord" (Exodus 9:3), "the eyes of the Lord" (Genesis 38:7), "the ears of the Lord" (Numbers 11:1), et cetera? These phrases are in line with the level of understanding of people, who can only comprehend physical existence, and the Torah speaks in terms that we can understand. All examples of this nature are merely attributory. For example, when it says, "If I whet My glittering sword" - does God really have a sword and does He really kill with one?! Such phrases are Mashal, ( parables).

G' does not have parts, however, what is the idea of the two Midot, Din and Rachamim?( Bearing in mind that this is not THE idea or THE explanation since those are impossible).
Midat Hadin can be understood as Natural Law. This is the system that governs planetary motion as well as human interaction. In terms of Midat hadin the laws are set. If you light a match it will burn, if you drop something off of a platform, it will fall.In Parashat Noah it was Midat Hadin that the world be destroyed.The natural system had been abrogated to the extent that the law would have a clear A- B corrolation of corruption to destruction. However, out of Midat Harachamim Noah was permitted to build the Ark and preserve both humanity and the ecosystem, and the world was not destroyed. The question is what is Midat Harachamim such that it can supercede Midat Hadin and it is not a change in G'? In other words, we know that the two attributes are not two parts of G' , what is the relationship of Din to Rachamim such that it is within one idea and not a change?

I believe that the answer, or an approach to one, can be found in a similar question regarding Tefillah. The question in the area of Tefillah is, " How does tefillah work such that you can pray for something and we say that your prayer can be answered and yet it is not a change in G'

Tefillah is not a change in G', as those who worship the stars and their own psyches wish . G' does not change, since G' does not change our prayers can not be attempting the impossible. Tefilla, is a refocusing of Man to be in line with Chachama. In other words Tefilla is a change in Man not G'. When one changes themselves to fit inline with the Briah, they have new laws which are open to them. The system of creation operates differently depending on how you operate with in it, ( this is obvious, nature will deal differently with someone who looks both ways before crossing the street than someone who does not, the first will be protected whilst the second will very likely end up splattered on Madison Avenue, it is the same here if the causes are changed the effects can be assumed to change to suit). In other words, there is one system of laws created by G'. Within this system there are laws of the universe that we percieve like gravity which only demands mass to operate, and there are other laws which only apply to those that are of a certain stature. The second class of laws are just as unchanging as the first but they are also much more demanding. ( Again, if you act in a responsible way you will have a different outcome)

So to in Parashat Noah. The Midas Harachamim of Parashat Noah is that since Noah was at a level of human perfection it meant that he was subject to additional laws.

"And the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. 6 And it repented the LORD that He had made man on the earth, and it grieved Him at His heart. 7 And the LORD said: 'I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and creeping thing, and fowl of the air; for it repenteth Me that I have made them.' 8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD. "

The Midat Harachamim is not that G' changes and allows something to slip by. Rather, the creation of the system of Law in such a way that it has tiers, laws which apply to everyone, and laws which apply to smaller subsets is Midat Harachamim. Both Midat Hadin and Midat Harachamim are systems of cause and effect.The Creator Does Not change, Man changes and if he does he can become subject to new effects, the creation of the World in such a way to provide for Man's perfection is ( as I understand it) Midat harachamim.

Dialogues with a Modern Stoic

Recently I came across a website run by a " modern stoic". Amazed that there were individuals out there who considered themselves stoics, I sought to contact him and start a dialogue. I mentioned that I was a student in a yeshiva and thought that the stoic philosophy was very similar to the words of chazal in many cases.
In his reply email the gentleman asked me the following question.
" Do you believe that your god really cares about the extraordinary detail that goes into daily practice, especially on the Sabbath, of course. And if so, why?

I guess what I'm really asking is how much is divine expectation versus Rabbinical invention?"

The following is my letter in response to his question. Keep in mind that I was trying to avoid extreme detail and felt it was necessary for the sake of him understanding my basic point, to sacrifice some detail and clarity.In addition there are certain lines which seem redundant, again, my concern was to make sure that I communicated my point and as such there are certain repetitions.


First off, I just wanted to say again how thankful I am that we can engage in an honest and open investigation. It is yet another gift that I have been granted in this life. Please forgive me for lack of style, and if it seems that I am quoting from your question or from a source I apologize, it is merely for my organization.

You ask, “. Do you believe that your god really cares about the extraordinary detail that goes into daily practice, especially on the Sabbath, of course. And if so, why?” You go on further and ask, “I guess what I'm really asking is how much is divine expectation versus Rabbinical invention? I probably shouldn't compare your situation with the Catholic faith, but it's the first to come to mind: only fish on Fridays, celibate priests, infallible popes, birth control prohibition, et cetera. Is there a substantive difference between Catholic prohibitions and those of the Orthodox Jewish faith?

I think you are asking two separate questions. As I understand it, your first question pertains to the Jewish view of G-d, the proper service of him and the reasons for said service. The second question seems to seek a clarification of the system of Jewish law how it is derived, instituted and practiced. I will attempt to answer the questions in order.

Do I believe that my God really cares about the extraordinary detail that goes into my daily practice? No. Unequivocally God does not care. God does not need my service to him. God does not need anyone’s service nor does he need any of his creations for anything. To attribute a need to God would be to attribute a lack to him, he needs neither me nor my service .God is independent of his creations. The question then is, “if it is so that God does not want my service, then what is the purpose of my observance?” I believe that the answer to this question will come from an understanding of what Torah is and what its relationship to man is.
Man
As you know the essence of Man is his faculty of reason. The verse in Genesis 1 “27 And God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them”, is interpreted by the Talmudic scholars to be referring to the human intellect. Our purpose in life is to use our intellect to perceive reality and to live in accordance with it. This is I believe the same as the stoic adjuration to live in line with nature. What then is this system of Torah that has occupied the minds and governed the lives of Jews for the last 5 thousand years, and how does it relate to mans nature?

Torah
Torah is an intellectual system of life given to Man through the nation of Israel. The Torah exists in two media, written and oral. Neither is complete without the other and both were given to a mass of people at Sinai. Encompassed in the Torah are the commandments ( Mitzvos). The commandments (all six hundred and thirteen) are tools that God has given us to perfect our minds. Each individual commandment is aimed at removing a false notion of the universe and instilling the correct idea.
It is now possible to answer the question that we had asked earlier on, namely if God does not want my service what is the point of my service? The Torah is an intellectual system that was given to man to perfect himself. Each law in the Torah is designed with human nature in mind to guide Man to his ultimate potential. When we engage in the law we are not serving God for hopes of appeasing him or satisfying a desire . Rather what we aim at with our dedication to the law is a fulfillment of Man’s mission to live in line with his intellectual nature, and perceive the reality of the Universe as it really is and not as my psyche wishes it to be.

As per the second part of your question, I would point you to three verses in Deuteronomy ( Chapter 30:12-14). 12 It is not in heaven, that thou shouldest say: 'Who shall go up for us to heaven, and bring it unto us, and make us to hear it, that we may do it?' 13 Neither is it beyond the sea, that thou shouldest say: 'Who shall go over the sea for us, and bring it unto us, and make us to hear it, that we may do it?' 14 But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it. In terms of Rabbinic “invention” or the relationship between what was given and what we do , these verses stand out as the rubric. The words of God himself are quite clear. “It is not in the heavens”, the system of Torah was given over as an intellectual system for man and it is he who must master the law and interpret it. The rules and guidelines were given over to man and it is Man’s job to make sure it is kept. This is where the perception of “Rabbinic invention” comes in. It is true that there are rules or extensions of rules that were not given to Moses at Sinai. However, “ it is very nigh unto you” ,one must note that the very system of interpretation was within the system given to Moses at Sinai .
As I stated previously the Torah is an intellectual system which serves to perfect our lives. Again God does not need me or my service. The system of Torah was given to humanity as the tool for engaging the mind and accepting the reality of the laws of creation. It is up to the experts in the legal system to apply and extrapolate its principles. In that way there is no such thing as “Rabbinic invention” because the Torah given by God demands that there is a constant engagement of legal experts to properly understand it.

To recap, Man was given the Torah, a system of intellectual and moral perfection, not for Gods satisfaction ( which is impossible), but only so that Man can reach his potential and recognize the reality of the Universe. Man can only achieve true happiness, true success if he recognizes and lives in line with his nature, as Aurelius states in Book two of the Meditations. “This thou must always bear in mind, what is the nature of the whole, and what is my nature, and how this is related to that, and what kind of a part it is of what kind of a whole; and that there is no one who hinders thee from always doing and saying the things which are according to the nature of which thou art a part”. This is the goal of Torah and this is the philosophy of the Stoic masters as I see it.

Fantasy

What is fantasy?

In the previous post I wrote about a preliminary definition of Man, or at least three components of Man. To recap, the Instinct is the drive that pushes man to preserve himself. The Intellect is the drive that pushes him to see universal categories of existance. The Imagination is the tool that takes all collected data and categorizes it into essences and accidents for intellectual and instinctual uses.

Fantasy is a result of the three components that we already mentioned.

When Man uses his senses and comes to the Intellectual realization that he has a natural place in the Universe, he is immediately thrown into conflict. This conflict arises from the fact that the Intellect percieves that he is quite literally a very small fish in a tremendously large pond.This intellectual recognition poses a threat to the instinct, the part of Man that is concerned with self preservation. The instinct cannot abide by the fact that Man is not in control of his surroundings.In order to remove this pain the Man constructs scenarios and acts in such a way that will prove he is in control. The fantasy is a defense mechanism. The man cannot accept that he is vulnerable so he constructs an alternative view of the Natural order in which he is supreme.

This was best described by my friend Sean in a post at Matt's blog which can be accessed here:
http://kankanchadash.blogspot.com/2008/08/sean-on-architecture-and-fantasy.html

Man percieves that he is weak. He is vulnerable to the forces of Nature, a mere chill can layway him forever. What is man's response? He builds shelter. Shelter is necessary for him to survive the elements. How though does man relate to the shelter.Instead of viewing the house as a testament to his own weakness, he places the house in an alternative reality. The house is the fortress that protects Man from all harm. It is a testament not to weakness but to strength. My what a strong and beautiful bulding this is, surely it bears witness to the power and glory of its owner. This is fantasy at its clearest. The man has seen his weakness and responded to it by creating a monument to his strength, something that allows him to deny he ever was weak.

Man- Intellect, Instinct, Imagination

I have the tremendous bracha to have just started a new chavrusah with my friend Jonny. The topic of our study is Mitzvos and the Mishneh Torah. Our first hour of study brought out some amazing ideas and I thought it would be appropriate to share them , perhaps as the first in a series of posts resulting from this new endeavor.


Since our chavrusah is to focus on the area of Mitzvos as a system, we thought it would be beneficial to start out by defining some basic ideas that are relevant to mitzvos. Today we took on the concept of " Man".


What is Man?


This is a question that is all to hastily answered by most people. The immediate answer could be, "man is an animal". This is flawed because it fails to capture man's essence. Another answer could be " Man is intellect", this is flawed because man is not purely intellect. A more subtle approach would be the synthesis of these two catchphrases into " Man is a rational animal".This answer is also flawed but for a different reason than the two previous. This answer is flawed because the term " rational animal" is so in need of definition as to be practically meaningless.


In order to properly formulate the definition we first examined "Animal".


When an animal, say a cougar wakes up in the morning, it has immediate instinctual drives.The cougar is hungry so it goes out to the field and spots antelope.The cougars instinct tells him that this antelope is a food source. The cougar pounces on its prey , kills it, eats it and satisfies its instinctual need for food. When the cougar needs to mate, it again goes to the field spots a female cougar utilizes it to his procreative need and satisfies his instinct. When the cougar needs shade it finds a tree and rests beneath it allowing the boughs to keep the sun's rays from causing harm.The animal is capable of seeing good for himself. The cougar can see a shady spot and instinct will guide it to rest, a plump antelope to eat, and a young female to sport with.


How does the instinctual gratification of the Cougar compare to that of Man?


When Man wakes up in the morning he is also hungry. He can gather food, he understands what is and is not food. Similarly he needs to procreate so he looks for and finds a mate. He relates to the instinctual needs similarly to the cougar. He needs to eat, he needs to procreate, he needs shelter. Man also has another element though. When he gazes on an apple tree, he does not just see food, he does not just see shade. There is something beyond the immediate instinct that Man has the ability to comprehend. Man can see the apple tree recognizes it as a source of physical good and then can make a breakthrough. All of a sudden he can see the tree and place it into a general category of "Plant" and can fit that into part of the overall ecosystem. He can perceive the tree as both food and as part of a universal category.



This ability to see the world both in terms of immediate instinct and universal categories is our working definition for " intellect". When the cougar wakes up he immediately starts collecting data and uses it to satisfy his instinctual needs. When Man wakes up he collects data for his instinctual needs and also uses that data and fits it into universal categories. He sees the world as both individual circumstances for fulfilling his instinct and a unified order of nature.



We now have a clear distinction between Man and Animal.The question now is how does the Man take the data that he has collected and use said data?

As the sensory data is collected it is acted on by the " imagination". The Imagination is the part of man that collects the sensory data and orders it into essences and accidents based on the frameworks of either the Instinct or the Intellect.For instance the Man can see a bone lying on the ground. His imagination will then categorize this bone as " essentially a weapon with which I can fend off predators"( an example of the Imagination viewing instinctual essences and accidents), or he can see this bone and view it as " essentially a part of the skeleton of an antelope" and intellectually fit it into the universal system of nature.

To recap we have three aspects, Instinct- the part of man that tells him he is hungry,he needs shade, he needs reproduction.Intellect- the part that puts the data that his senses collect into categorical terms, views everything he comes in contact with as part of a universal. Imagination- the part that takes the data and views it in terms of essences and accidents of both the Instinctual and Intellectual.

To be continued....